Guest viewing is limited

Should we post images of dead children?

  • Strongly NO

    Votes: 109 47.6%
  • Yes only images show the true face of war

    Votes: 97 42.4%
  • Can't decide

    Votes: 23 10.0%

  • Total voters
    229
if we allow that this entire website would be watched and we don’t want that. I smoke weed and I sure as hell don’t want the cops coming here and finding it. My house constantly smells like it too. If you’re concerned and “oh think of the children” you can go on google images. I’m sure it will be in the news.
 
Last edited:
No never not only is it wrong which is the most important, it's just incredibly stupid on every level.
 
I do not see anything wrong post image of dead children
what can not and have pornography about that child.
 
I'm in shock.
Users of this site are abnormal.
 
Last edited:
Photos showing the death of children and their autopsies are the most important.
 
I say no...for three reasons...
1. There are plenty of dead men to take pics of.
2. It might encourage pedophiles.
3. It will definitely bring unwanted attention to this (already controversial) site.

Absolutely agree.
 
no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
It would be asking for trouble for literal kids to be posted on a site called "Cutedeadguys".
 
It would be asking for trouble for literal kids to be posted on a site called "Cutedeadguys".
It would, and in the current environment giving politicians an excuse to Do Something™ seems particularly unwise...
 
YES. Show images or video's of kids being killed or dead kids. I thought this site and the community was hardcore.. i guess it's not.
I read here that it might encourage pedophiles. Pedophiles are attracted to children. Not dead children.
I am a heterosexual. I am attracted to women. Not dead women.
Pedo necrophilia is a thing now too?

I'm new here but it seems like i see quite some necrophiliacs. Do they feel encouraged to murder people because they're seeing images of dead people?
If the answer is yes, i retake my answer.
 
one never knows???? so why in the hell encourage it just in case it would???
rather be safe than sorry...…….
why look for trouble???????
 
adkiY61l.jpg

[SUB]Morgue in Gaza, Nov 19 2012. Dozen of children have been killed in Israeli air strikes in recent days.
[/SUB]
Should we post pics of dead children?

Innocent kids are getting killed in war zones around the world every day, latest victims from Gaza but hundreds of children were killed in Syria this year as well.

Please vote but before you click think for a minute.

If we stop will this change anything? Will the world become a better place?

The answer is NO.

It's hard, it's sick & tragic so many families torn apart in meaningless conflict.

Still I am strongly for posting graphic images from war zones and I believe an photo tells you much more than a lengthy news article.

All war, all religion should be banned on Earth.

Will it ever happen? :not sure:
Well IIMO I have a great solution on this that can help, just ignore the posts go to your favorite section and have others decide. Its like mysellf with women post :censored:
 
Voted “yes if the true face of war”. Given the option to avoid posting a pic with aftermath of war, or crime scene, just because they’re a casualty and in the frame would do a disservice to the value of the photo or video. For example, if there is a group of victims who are adults, including a younger victim in the mix, do we not post the pic just because? I guess it could be argued further of the content or meaning of it as in is the body being violated just because. Then I’m a no on this one.
 
Absolutely not: I wouldn't stay at CDG if such a choice were offered. Even in our style, there are moral rules (and, in any case, it would conflict with the laws of many of our countries). In short: no, no, no 😬…
 
Back
Top