Should we post images of dead children?

Should we post images of dead children?

  • Strongly NO

    Votes: 96 50.3%

  • Yes only images show the true face of war

    Votes: 75 39.3%

  • Can't decide

    Votes: 20 10.5%
  • Total voters
    191
You know Meat, there could be a middle ground here. What if you have a designated thread, posted only in the Secret Room, where these types of pics can be shown. Have it not allowed anywhere else. Then you can just have the Elite see them. Might have better control that way.
 
This sort of thing belongs in "sick news", or "disaster", where the intent is not sexual, like it is in "True Gore Images" or "True Gore Video Clips", or "Secret Room", in my opinion.

Stuff in Sick News and Disaster, I never got the impression that it was for those sort of purposes anyways.

Censorship in North America is much worse. I'd get into trouble just for viewing a necrophiliac site like this!

I'd want to play it safe and vote against posting pics of dead people both male or female under the age of 18, or even 21, depending on which country, state, or province you are in the age of majority varies.

Keep in mind that necrophiliacs are viewed as just as bad as pedophiles and murderers in some countries like Canada, especially with the recent case of Luke Magnotta still fresh in the mind of Canadians, which associate necrophiliacs more alike murderers and cannibals.
 
I really dont care. Let people post freely. If some folks don't like what they see they can simply stop looking.
 
I think that children should be a no here we are all adults here and for the reason of that children should be a no. I agree that it is tragic and will probaly not change the world or war or as here children will be killed but I am am not or maybe we are the forum to not have them on our site but to show that children should be protected more from the violence that they may be subjected too.
 
Meatpie said:
Why the sudden change bindi?

Anyway, the way things are going I expect we will issue a complete ban on dead child photos in December.
Click to expand...

decembers almost over............................................
 
Posting a picture of a dead child in a "news around the world" category on a sex site is still posting a child's photo on a sex site.

I would assume police from around the world visit here regularly, so It's not enough to just *say* you dont approve of child pornography, you have to make a visible effort to remove it and keep it off the site.
 
Access to the disputed section is divided by country. Somewhere allowed from 16, somewhere from 14. Why deny the pleasure of those who are allowed?
 
Let's face it. People come to this forum to wackoff. And wacking off to little kids is too icky for me. If pubic/armpit/facial hair is visible then it's OK with me. If you have to go by age then this is my suggestion


  • 14 for "kids" from regions where they are normally fed with HORMONE-LADEN food such as North America. They start to grow hair down there by the time the hit their 13th birthday.

  • 16 for "kids" from more healthier regions such as Europe, etc...

  • 18 for "kids" from regions where food are more plant-based like Africa, Far East, etc... They don't grow hair down there till they hit their 21st birthday from what I heard.

It's no use discussing the various laws. If they want to shut this forum down, then they will find some odd laws somewhere to do that.
 
Last edited:
The nature of this site requires us to be clean as far as underage pics go!
 
sumtingwong said:
You think if the authorities want to close down this forum, removing "undergaged" pics will stop them? How fucking NAIVE!
Click to expand...

It may not stop them, but why give them such a very good reason?
 
If someone is intent on stopping this forum, they will find an excuse, reason and/or a way regardless of whatever is or is not posted. When someone has an agenda that they want to see come to fruition, they will take and use whatever steps are necessary to see their mission through to the very end. While children do die as a direct result of mankind's actions, inactions, thoughts, beliefs and whatnot and this occurs on a regular basis and is an unfortunate failure in human society and mankind's existence, I do not feel this forum is the place for their images to be posted. We are all adults and have the knowledge and capacity to realize the atrocities of the world in which we live and we do not need to see the graphic details to be reminded of this fact; especially when it comes to children. It is already bad enough that their lives have been cut short and their innocence lost. There is no reason for displaying the gruesome aftermath for whatever reason. We should be protecting our children, both in life and in death. If someone feels that the images need to be displayed to remind us of how bad things are then they do not truly understand how bad the world has fallen and are actually part of the problem and not part of the solution. A line must be drawn somewhere that we do not cross and I feel this is one of the places to do so.
 
I agree with your comments completely but I am concerned that outsiders will interprete these photos as some sort of affirmation of pedophilia or perversion.
 
I say no...for three reasons...
1. There are plenty of dead men to take pics of.
2. It might encourage pedophiles.
3. It will definitely bring unwanted attention to this (already controversial) site.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Meatpie
Syria Genocide: More than 50 mutilated corpses found in Homs, including women & kids
Replies
0
Views
5K
Meatpie
Meatpie
Back
Top