Dorkydavey

Forum Newcomer
Joined
Nov 26, 2010
Messages
13
Location
Lexington Kentucky
In most countries you can get in serious trouble for looking at certain kinds of pictures if the person in the picture is under 18. I wonder how this applies to looking at necro pictures I tried navigating through this website trying to find an answer to my question but to no avail. "But then again I'm not very computer literate when it comes to forums":kewl pics:
 
And anyone hurting or abusing children should be hung and beaten with clubs till there's nothing left!
 
We have zero tolerance towards pedos if that's what you are hinting at.
 
If I was a pedophile, I would have to kill myself. Everyone hates them. There is no treatment that really works, except for some form of castration, through drugs, or what ever.Child porn is awful and sick because it hurts the victims so much. Looking a dead bodies is not hurting the person in the photo any more than they are already.
 
here in USA is a felony even only to posses pictures of minors in sexual activities, also you get classified as a sexual predator forever (after your time in jail), that means you need to register with the local police department, unable to live close to places like schools and parks, many associations also prohibit rent or own a house if you are registered as sexual predator. if not they send a notice to all the people of the association with all your physical characteristics and pic, forget to find a job..... . With respect to necro activities that is a grey area, but very dangerous to test. Here the judicial system has a VERY!! low tolerance for pedophiles, and that is good.

Higladius.
 
This is all fantasy!

I believe that the administrators of this website make it clear that we're all engaged in a fantasy and/or fetish whenever we're reading or posting here. Even comments such as "real" and "IRL" are intended to be interpreted as part of the fantasy and not ever true and accurate except in our fantasy lives. And that includes statements made in private mail. I've also understood that every photo is a link to a public publication from a newspaper or other public forum that was originally printed because the editors of that publication determined that it would be a matter of general public interest. All other photos are manipulations and artwork. We all agreed that this is a fetish no different than any other fetish commonly recognized as such. And in my participation I absolutely believed that I was at all times in lawful compliance of the spirit and intent of all prohibitions of such restrictions in every jurisdiction that this website may be monitored. At least that has been my understanding. Also, I've always understood that privacy is strictly enforced. If my participation here has in any way been inaccurate I will promptly disengage in any participation here, and disavow any of my comments or viewing.
 
some of the images do make me uncomfortable due to questionable age of some of the victims/models/actors.
 
I believe that the administrators of this website make it clear that we're all engaged in a fantasy and/or fetish whenever we're reading or posting here. Even comments such as "real" and "IRL" are intended to be interpreted as part of the fantasy and not ever true and accurate except in our fantasy lives. And that includes statements made in private mail. I've also understood that every photo is a link to a public publication from a newspaper or other public forum that was originally printed because the editors of that publication determined that it would be a matter of general public interest. All other photos are manipulations and artwork. We all agreed that this is a fetish no different than any other fetish commonly recognized as such. And in my participation I absolutely believed that I was at all times in lawful compliance of the spirit and intent of all prohibitions of such restrictions in every jurisdiction that this website may be monitored. At least that has been my understanding. Also, I've always understood that privacy is strictly enforced. If my participation here has in any way been inaccurate I will promptly disengage in any participation here, and disavow any of my comments or viewing.

I agree with much said here, I'm not sure that video of underage boys being killed 'might' not get lumped under pedo laws?

Side note: I'm impressed with your command of the language in this comment :)
 
Back
Top