The third one is sacrilegious.

Why, because Jesus is nude? First, the Romans crucified their victims in the nude. Remember, "they cast lots for his clothes" The loincloth is a later addition. Second, the whole reason that Jesus dies on the cross is because it was the most humiliating painful form of execution. Nudity would have increased the humiliation. Otherwise, the Sanhedrin could have simply taken Jesus out of the city and stoned him to death, as they did others such as St Steven!
 
Hot! No. 4 with the black background is sweet. Looks like a Greco painting, pale skin, shadowy. is there more of him???
 
Hangtime is 100% correct. Guys were crucified nude. The loincloth is just another made up bit of nonsense.

There was an old Yahoo Group site dedicated to crucifixion with a ton of hot pics. Hope this thread brings some of that back.
 
Great pics manuel thanks for sharing them!
 
Nudity wasn't the problem but the hard-on is. This depiction is needlessly insensitive to Christians.
 
There is still a group for cross postings - every Easter there are re-enactments of Christ's crucifiction. Some guys got together in Ontario a few years back where there were three crosses erected and one guy went on the middle one for a period of time. Sorry I do not have pictures.
 
Nudity wasn't the problem but the hard-on is. This depiction is needlessly insensitive to Christians.

Antinotis, what hardon? That dick is pointing straight down! And I am a Christian, and the pic does not offend me. This is exactly how Jesus would have been depicted before the Church and medieval artists decided to tone things down.
 
crucified nude in medieval art

not all. here some from medieval artists (one from Michelangelo, now in a church in Florenz)

I think, an erection crucified man was very often. death on the cross comes by slow suffocation

 
I guess for me that is at least a semi hard-on. The problem is that the picture is hot. For Christians it is the suffering of Christ for our sins that we need to see depicted. Unfortunately, this picture doesn't make one mindful of that. That reduces it to pornography. But we can disagree. If you don't think it is sacrilegious, then I accept that. Either way, at least with us Christians, there won't be any violent backlash.

I love your avatar. I can enjoy his hard-on for he is just a man and not God in flesh. Just my opinion.
 
Back
Top